The most comprehensive and critical analysis of the application of European consensus by the European Court of Human Rights.

Presents a critical evaluation of a controversial interpretative tool the ECtHR uses to answer morally/politically sensitive human rights questions.

The European Court of Human Rights has long been part of the most advanced human rights regime in the world. However, the Court has increasingly drawn criticism

Explores how the European Court of Human Rights understands 'democracy' and might support more deliberative, participatory and inclusive practices.

Nussberger traces the history of the European Court of Human Rights from its political context in the 1940s to the present day, answering pressing questions abo