Bayesian Nets and Causality: Philosophical and Computational Foundations

Bayesian Nets and Causality: Philosophical and Computational Foundations
Author :
Publisher : Oxford University Press
Total Pages :
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780191523939
ISBN-13 : 0191523933
Rating : 4/5 (933 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Bayesian Nets and Causality: Philosophical and Computational Foundations by : Jon Williamson

Download or read book Bayesian Nets and Causality: Philosophical and Computational Foundations written by Jon Williamson and published by Oxford University Press. This book was released on 2004-12-23 with total page pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Bayesian nets are widely used in artificial intelligence as a calculus for causal reasoning, enabling machines to make predictions, perform diagnoses, take decisions and even to discover causal relationships. But many philosophers have criticised and ultimately rejected the central assumption on which such work is based - the Causal Markov Condition. So should Bayesian nets be abandoned? What explains their success in artificial intelligence? This book argues that the Causal Markov Condition holds as a default rule: it often holds but may need to be repealed in the face of counterexamples. Thus Bayesian nets are the right tool to use by default but naively applying them can lead to problems. The book develops a systematic account of causal reasoning and shows how Bayesian nets can be coherently employed to automate the reasoning processes of an artificial agent. The resulting framework for causal reasoning involves not only new algorithms but also new conceptual foundations. Probability and causality are treated as mental notions - part of an agent's belief state. Yet probability and causality are also objective - different agents with the same background knowledge ought to adopt the same or similar probabilistic and causal beliefs. This book, aimed at researchers and graduate students in computer science, mathematics and philosophy, provides a general introduction to these philosophical views as well as an exposition of the computational techniques that they motivate.


Bayesian Nets and Causality: Philosophical and Computational Foundations Related Books

Bayesian Nets and Causality: Philosophical and Computational Foundations
Language: en
Pages:
Authors: Jon Williamson
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2004-12-23 - Publisher: Oxford University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Bayesian nets are widely used in artificial intelligence as a calculus for causal reasoning, enabling machines to make predictions, perform diagnoses, take deci
Bayesian Nets and Causality: Philosophical and Computational Foundations
Language: en
Pages: 250
Authors: Jon Williamson
Categories: Computers
Type: BOOK - Published: 2005 - Publisher: Oxford University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Bayesian nets are used in artificial intelligence as a calculus for causal reasoning, enabling machines to make predictions perform diagnoses, take decisions an
Bayesian Networks
Language: en
Pages: 275
Authors: Timo Koski
Categories: Mathematics
Type: BOOK - Published: 2011-08-26 - Publisher: John Wiley & Sons

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Bayesian Networks: An Introduction provides a self-contained introduction to the theory and applications of Bayesian networks, a topic of interest and importanc
Philosophical Foundations of Mixed Methods Research
Language: en
Pages: 259
Authors: Yafeng Shan
Categories: Psychology
Type: BOOK - Published: 2023-12-01 - Publisher: Taylor & Francis

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Philosophical Foundations of Mixed Methods Research provides a comprehensive examination of the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. It offers n
Causality and Causal Modelling in the Social Sciences
Language: en
Pages: 236
Authors: Federica Russo
Categories: Social Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2008-09-18 - Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This investigation into causal modelling presents the rationale of causality, i.e. the notion that guides causal reasoning in causal modelling. It is argued tha